I received an email
today urging me to “save marriage” and sign a petition against the bill going
before parliament seeking the right for gay people to marry. The email assumed
that since I was a Christian minister I would happily sign it and help “save marriage”.
I sat at my desk reading the information, which was very brief and irrational.
It just confuses me. How can giving two people the right to make a public
commitment to a long term, responsible and intimate relationship be a danger to
marriage?
I like the diagram my
daughter affirmed on facebook. It is true. The real biblical perspective on
sexuality and marriage is not as straightforward as it is often assumed. There
are a lot of ancient cultural influences, and we cannot willy nilly choose some
and not others. Here, briefly, is my perspective on homosexuality/lesbian
relationships.
The “nature-nurture”
question
I have read so many
different articles, essays and the occasional book on this subject. I have
known a number of gay people, most of whom were in stable, life enhancing
relationships. There are writings that tell us “gayness” is a natural state and
that the people do not choose to be gay. Then there are articles and
testimonies from “ex-gay” people who claim to have been “cured”. Of course there are the religious
people who say that even if it is a “natural state” such people should stay
“chaste” and not express their sexuality. The “act” is the “sin”, not “being
gay.” Other articles claim that “gayness” happens because of environmental
issues, family dynamics, abuse or some other events in their life. It is
assumed by “righteous” people then, that the right counselling, praying or
attitudes could set them straight.
I read this one essay
that to me had a ring of truth about. I cannot remember the author or where I found it, but it
seemed to me to be true to life. This claimed that we are all, by our birth,
somewhere on a continuum between definitely hetero through to definitely gay.
Those born gay will be gay, and those who are definite hetero will be hetero.
It is not a choice you make. There are those who are somewhere in the middle of
the continuum, (perhaps they could be bi?) and for them some environmental
factors could lead them to be either gay or hetero. For most in this situation,
because our culture favours hetero, they will become hetero. Others, because of life events could
become gay. It seems to me that the gays who claim to be “cured” probably fall
into this midstream category. So I see the confusion of articles and essays
about the “nature-nurture” question of “gayness” to stem from this sort of
reality. I do not think any choose to be gay, it just is the way they are. I
cannot conceive of a person choosing to be gay, even in our more liberal and
open society, it would bring so many extra challenges into life. I have concluded that “nature”, ( in
some cases, with the added influence of “nurture”) made gay people who they
are.
God and Gays
I do not think the God
of love would deny a gay person his/her expression of love through sexual
intimacy. Love between people is love and to me the expression of that through
sexual intimacy and play enhances, affirms and builds the bond between two
people. This is true of hetero relationships, but also true of gay
partnerships. I do not believe that it is wrong for people to express their
love in this way. If you like, I think “God smiles” wherever life-enhancing
love is expressed. Now if I am a definite heterosexual I may struggle to accept
or find commonality with the lovemaking of a gay couple. It may even repulse me. This inability
to put oneself in another’s situation, I believe, causes much of the anti-gay
feeling and reaction. Love though, is love and is good, full stop! Intimacy at
its highest, from intimacy of minds and hearts through to the same intimacy
expressed in sexual play also is life enhancing and good. This, as I see it
applies to hetero couples and gays. (Promiscuity, for both gays and
heterosexuals, is to my mind, not life enhancing, nor person affirming.) I have
come to believe that our physical intimacy should be representative of and
express whatever personal intimacy we have. When the two align, I believe it is
“of love” and fits in God’s purposes for wholesome, and fulfilling living and
relating. This is true whether we are
gay or hetero.
Marriage
We have tended to
define marriage as between male and female. It is also linked to the rearing of
a family. But isn’t it delightful when two eighty year olds find love and
commit to marriage? We do not refuse to marry them, even though no family can
result. At it’s heart marriage is
a committed responsible intimate relationship between two people who love one
another and choose to keep that love alive. It is a public commitment to be
responsible, caring toward each other, and to nurture the health of that
relationship. A good marriage is one of the greatest experiences in life, you
always have that one person you are “at home with” and who is there for you. It
is a deeply affirming anchor point in life. The act of becoming married
enhances that relationship and can be an ongoing living motivational springboard,
which keeps the relationship healthy, bonded, and deepening. I do not believe
it is right to deny that sort of relationship, that sort of public commitment
to a gay partnership! It can only help gay couples to better express the
reality of their life together and what they mean to one another. From my
perspective, marriage is defined by the commitment to responsible relationship.
Allowing gay’s to marry does nothing to destroy this! In fact it gives the
opportunity for others to express its reality in their partnership and their
lives.
I will not be signing the
petition nor will I be passing the email on.